Inspired by JFK’s
endorsement, I read all Ian Fleming’s Bond books when I was a teenager.
Recently I read a book of Fleming’s letters written contemporaneously with the
publication of each Bond book. It fascinated me to learn about how uncertain
Fleming was about 007, about how much advice he required, about how much
support he needed to flesh out the details about the cars, locations, plants
and animals he included in his books.
Concurrent with
reading Fleming’s letters, I decided to read one of my favorite Bond books –
Thunderball, the ninth of the 13 Fleming published. I was amazed at how thin it
is, how flimsy the plot, how bare the dialogue, how one-dimensional the
characters. It took Fleming just two months to write each of his books; he
would retire to Goldeneye, his home in Jamaica, and write them each year in
January and February.
Fleming’s formula was
simple: An evil character threatens the world through some form of technology
and Bond – at considerable risk to himself – uses his wile and physical talents
to defeat him. And of course he gets the girl. While the books are set in
different locations and the bad guys and weapons vary, the bones are identical.
But the stories carry little suspense – they’re predictably pure escapism,
paint by numbers.
Speaking of which--I
recently noticed my son and his friends – all twentysomethings – spending
considerable time with adult coloring books marketed, according to CNN, “to stressed-out, work-addled adults, who
want to benefit from the quiet zen that a coloring session can bring.” Several
coloring books even sit among the top ten Amazon best sellers.
By today’s standards
Fleming’s Bond series are barely comic books, but they mutated and evolved to
become the foundation of a giant book and movie business and icons of our
culture.
Maybe
adult coloring books will follow a similar path – increasingly complex
patterns, the leap to apps, and finally “Coloring Book – The Movie.” In 3-D.
Michael, while I stopped reading the Bond books when, in one -- The Spy Who Loved Me (?) -- Fleming has the heroine/victim of home invasion wondering whether a new arrival (Bond) is a possible rescuer or another threat. She notes that he has the same eyes (of a killer) as her captors.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteIn reading Ian Fleming's letters, and also in Thunderball, I too was struck by the adjectives he used to describe Bond, particularly as he showed up to the ladies. By today's standards they would be completely unacceptable -- a word like "cruel" would certainly not be seen as an asset. By no means am I defending Fleming, but standards and mores do change over time and if we judge what he wrote then by today's norms then we're guilty of "presentism." Best to step into the time machine and go back to the 60s in reading the original Bond stories.
ReplyDelete